Imagine sitting quietly in a room with your eyes closed.
Now imagine describing a mountain thousands of kilometres away… identifying structures hidden beneath it… or observing a place you’ve never physically visited.
It sounds like science fiction.
Yet this is exactly where the latest Supertalks podcast begins.
When host Raghav Sharma asked Nikki Dutta, India’s first remote viewer, a simple question—“What exactly is remote viewing?”—the answer opened the door to a conversation that questioned how we understand consciousness itself.
For Nikki, remote viewing isn’t magic.
It isn’t imagination.
And according to him, it isn’t even the soul leaving the body.
Instead, he describes it as accessing information through a state of consciousness that exists beyond physical limitations.
Whether readers approach this subject with curiosity or scepticism, remote viewing remains one of the most discussed topics in consciousness research, military history, and alternative science.
What Is Remote Viewing According to Nikki Dutta?
The very first definition Nikki gives is surprisingly simple.
According to him, remote viewing is the ability to access information about a location while physically remaining somewhere else.
He immediately clarifies one common misunderstanding.
Remote viewing, according to his explanation, is not the soul travelling outside the body.
Instead, it involves moving human consciousness into a different state where information can be perceived through what he calls extra-sensory perception (ESP).
This distinction becomes important throughout the podcast because Nikki repeatedly separates consciousness from the physical body.
In his words, consciousness is capable of functioning beyond ordinary human senses.
The Idea of “Non-Local Consciousness”
One phrase appears several times during the conversation.
Non-local consciousness.
According to Nikki, consciousness does not remain trapped inside the human brain.
Instead, it exists independently of physical space.
This means that information may be accessible without travelling physically.
He explains that our energetic body receives information before our physical body becomes aware of it.
This concept forms the foundation of every remote viewing session discussed later in the podcast.
If consciousness is truly non-local, then distance becomes less important.
Whether the target is another city, another country—or even another planet—the process, according to Nikki, remains the same.
A Brief Background: Where Did Remote Viewing Come From?
While the podcast focuses on Nikki’s experiences, the idea of remote viewing itself has existed for decades.
The term became widely known during the 1970s when researchers in the United States explored whether individuals could describe distant locations without conventional communication.
Some government-funded experiments investigated the possibility that consciousness could gather intelligence remotely.
Supporters believe these experiments produced intriguing results.
Critics argue the evidence has never met modern scientific standards for repeatability.
This ongoing debate explains why remote viewing continues to fascinate both believers and sceptics.
For Nikki Dutta, however, the discussion is less about government history and more about personal experience.
Remote Viewing Is More Than Closing Your Eyes
Many people assume remote viewing simply means imagining a place.
Nikki strongly disagrees.
According to his explanation, imagination and remote viewing are completely different processes.
Rather than creating images mentally, he describes remote viewing as receiving information.
Instead of “thinking,” the viewer attempts to observe.
Instead of analysing, the viewer allows impressions to emerge naturally.
This difference is central to his understanding of the practice.
The viewer is not inventing information.
They are attempting to perceive it.
How “Location Mapping” Works
One of the most interesting concepts introduced in the podcast is something Nikki calls location mapping.
According to him, a remote viewer closes their eyes while another person guides the process.
The viewer then becomes almost like a compass.
Instead of physically walking toward a destination, consciousness is directed toward a specific location.
Once attention reaches that location, observations begin.
It was through this method, Nikki says, that he explored places such as Mount Kailash, Mars, and several other locations discussed later in the interview.
Although he doesn’t explain every technical step, location mapping appears to be the bridge between consciousness and observation in his remote viewing work.
Why Mount Kailash Became One of His Most Important Experiences
The first major example Nikki shares involves Mount Kailash.
Using remote viewing, he claims to have observed unusual electromagnetic elements within the mountain.
According to him, these materials did not appear to belong to Earth.
He further describes an advanced Inner Earth civilisation connected to the mountain and links it with ancient Sumerian knowledge.
These observations eventually led the conversation toward subjects such as Shambhala, advanced technology, and hidden civilizations.
Regardless of whether readers accept these conclusions, the Mount Kailash discussion demonstrates how Nikki believes remote viewing can be applied to locations that remain physically inaccessible.
Can Remote Viewing Go Beyond Earth?
One surprising aspect of the interview is that Nikki doesn’t limit remote viewing to Earth.
He explains that Project Red focused entirely on Mars.
According to him, remote viewing sessions revealed rivers, mountains, pyramidal structures and evidence of ancient intelligent life.
He also describes underground settlements where survivors supposedly continued living after Mars lost its atmosphere.
These observations become possible, he argues, because consciousness itself isn’t restricted by physical distance.
If consciousness is truly non-local, then observing Mars follows the same principle as observing a mountain on Earth.
Does Science Accept Remote Viewing?
This is perhaps the biggest question surrounding the subject.
The short answer is no not as an established scientific phenomenon.
Mainstream neuroscience and psychology have not accepted remote viewing as a proven method of acquiring information.
Most scientists argue that there is insufficient repeatable evidence demonstrating that consciousness can reliably access distant locations.
At the same time, researchers interested in consciousness continue exploring questions about perception, awareness and human cognition.
This is one reason why remote viewing remains controversial.
It exists in a space where curiosity, anecdotal experiences and scientific scepticism continue to intersect.
The Supertalks conversation reflects this ongoing debate rather than claiming it has been resolved.
Why People Continue Exploring It
Even though opinions differ, remote viewing continues attracting attention for one simple reason.
It asks a profound question.
Are human beings capable of perceiving more than their five senses?
For some people, the answer is clearly no.
For others, consciousness may still contain abilities that science has not yet fully understood.
Nikki belongs firmly in the second group.
Throughout the interview, he encourages people not to believe him blindly.
Instead, he suggests remaining open-minded while continuing to question everything.
As the interview progresses, something becomes increasingly clear.
For Nikki, remote viewing is not actually about seeing hidden places.
It’s about understanding consciousness itself.
Whether discussing Mount Kailash, Mars, future civilizations or advanced technology, every conversation begins with the same assumption:
Human consciousness is far more powerful than most people realise.
Remote viewing is simply one way of exploring that possibility.
Why This Conversation Resonated With So Many Viewers
The popularity of this episode isn’t just because it discusses mysterious subjects.
It’s because it combines spirituality, consciousness, history and future technology into one conversation.
Some viewers watched because they were curious about Mount Kailash.
Others wanted to understand remote viewing.
Many simply wanted to hear a perspective that challenged conventional thinking.
Regardless of personal beliefs, the episode encouraged people to ask larger questions about the human mind and the nature of reality.
Sometimes, that curiosity is more valuable than finding immediate answers.
Final Thoughts
Remote viewing remains one of the world’s most debated ideas.
To some, it represents unexplored potential within human consciousness.
To others, it remains an unverified claim requiring stronger scientific evidence.
During the Supertalks podcast, Nikki Dutta presents remote viewing as a practical method for accessing information beyond ordinary perception. His explanation centres on non-local consciousness, extra-sensory perception and the belief that awareness is not confined to the physical body.
Whether readers view these ideas as possibilities, hypotheses or personal experiences, the conversation succeeds in encouraging a deeper exploration of one timeless question:
How much do we really know about the human mind?
Frequently Asked Questions
What is remote viewing?
According to Nikki Dutta, remote viewing is the ability to gather information about distant places without physically travelling there by accessing a different state of consciousness.
Is remote viewing the same as astral projection?
No. In the podcast, Nikki specifically says remote viewing is not the soul leaving the body. He describes it as shifting consciousness rather than physically or spiritually travelling.
What is non-local consciousness?
According to Nikki Dutta, non-local consciousness refers to awareness that exists beyond the physical body and is not limited by distance.
What is location mapping?
Location mapping is the process Nikki describes where a remote viewer directs consciousness toward a specific location and attempts to observe information without being physically present.
Is remote viewing scientifically proven?
No. Remote viewing is not accepted as established science. While it has been explored by some researchers and government programmes in the past, mainstream science considers the evidence inconclusive.
Editorial Note: This article summarises Nikki Dutta’s views shared during the Supertalks podcast. Background information has been included to help readers understand the broader subject. Claims discussed in the podcast remain the guest’s personal interpretations and are not established scientific facts.
